Showing posts with label McCain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label McCain. Show all posts

Thursday, October 30, 2008

John McCain's health care plan "won't guarantee coverage of cancer screenings or maternity care."

Planned Parenthood on Friday, October 24th, 2008 in a TV ad

Few "guarantees" in McCain's plan

True

The Planned Parenthood Action Fund has launched an attack ad on John McCain that makes a case that his health care plan hurts women.

The ad features a nurse, Shaina Klackle, talking about a study created by the Planned Parenthood Action Fund.

"As a nurse, I'm concerned about your health care," Klackle says. "And so is Planned Parenthood's Action Fund. In fact, their study found John McCain's plan won't guarantee coverage of cancer screenings or maternity care."

The ad goes on to make other claims about McCain's health plan, but here we wanted to look at the claim about guaranteed coverage for cancer screenings and maternity care.

We should say off the bat that McCain's health plan contains no details about specific conditions or coverage. The heart of his plan seeks to stimulate the market for individual health insurance by ending the tax exemption on employer-provided health care benefits in exchange for a tax credit. McCain hopes this will lead to greater competition in the health care market by allowing people to shop around for their own insurance. Also along those lines, his plan calls for allowing people to shop for policies across state lines, so they can purchase the most effective policy, no matter where the insurance provider is located.

It's that last provision that is the basis for Planned Parenthood's statement, according to the report they issued to back up the ad. Many states have passed laws that say health care providers operating in their state must provide coverage in certain areas. Planned Parenthood cites requirements for cancer screenings and maternity care in more than 20 states. Under a McCain plan, insurers could operate in any state and sell all over the country.

A rollback of insurance requirements isn't spelled out in McCain's plan. But it's a reasonable fear, said Sara Collins of the Commonwealth Fund, a nonpartisan policy group that seeks to improve the health care system.

Health insurance requirements differ substantially from state to state, and insurance companies would likely locate in the states with the least regulations, Collins said.

"Ultimately, you would have an individual market that's not regulated in any state," Collins said. "It's very different from what we have right now."

Planned Parenthood's ad says that McCain's plan doesn't "guarantee" coverage of cancer screenings or maternity care, and on a literal level, that's true. But Planned Parenthood's deeper point is that some people have a "guarantee" under their respective state's current laws, and they could lose that guarantee under McCain's plan. McCain's plan has no literal guarantees for coverage, and Planned Parenthood makes an additional case that his regulations could undermine existing state guarantees. On that basis, we rate Planned Parenthood Action Fund's statement True.

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Friday, October 24, 2008

McCain’s Spending Freeze Would Send Us Into the Dark Ages

With all the horrible decisions coming out of the McCain/Palin campaign, it's almost like shooting fish in a barrel (or wolves from a helicopter) to point out more failure.

But we shouldn't let McCain get a free-ride on his proposed government spending freeze. If for some fluke of a reason (2000 election, anyone?) McCain wins this thing, his proposed freeze will send us back into the Dark Ages.

During the first debate, McCain's off-the-cuff answer about fixing the ailing economy:

"How about a spending freeze on everything but defense, veteran affairs and entitlement programs."

Some would think after a hot-headed, ill-advised statement like that, the presidential hopeful would try and distance himself -- pretend it never happened.

But instead, he fought back against Barack Obama's previous description of his vast spending freeze, in the final presidential debate saying:

"OK, what -- what would I cut? I would have, first of all, across-the-board spending freeze, OK? Some people say that's a hatchet. That's a hatchet, and then I would get out a scalpel, OK?"

No Senator McCain -- a government spending freeze of "everything but defense, veteran affairs and entitlement programs" is not OK.

Dennis Van Roekel, President of the National Education Association said:

"He still fails to grasp the direct link between a 21st century education system and a robust economy." He continued, "a No Child Left Behind funding gap of $15 billion and putting a crunch on millions of special education students, low-income students, children living in poverty and the hiring of future teachers."

McCain recently promised NASA $2 billion in funding for manned space flight, yet conveniently forgot to remind them of his hatchet.

He'll have to convince the DoD to include his Homeownership Resurgence Plan into their defense budget, because otherwise it would be axed under his spending freeze.

A majority of federal service providers like independent contractors, social workers, and those working for non-profit community organizations will become jobless. As will a ludicrous number of federal employees. ...Isn't that just about the exact opposite of FDR's New Deal, which helped end the Great Depression?

The McCain health care tax credit (ya know, the one that only buys less than half a family's insurance premium) would come out of Medicaid and Medicare, which is a cut separate from the spending freeze. But it would no longer then be an entitlement, and thus would be subject to the spending freeze.

Let's take a quick look at several other agencies and programs the McConomist plan would freeze (and this is by no means an exhaustive list):


  • Executive Office of the President
  • Interest payments on the National Debt
  • Department of the Treasury
  • Department of Energy
  • Department of Agriculture / Rural Development
  • Food and Drug Administration
  • Department of Labor
  • Department of the Interior
  • Department of Transportation, Housing and Urban Development
  • Judiciary Appropriations
  • The Smithsonian Institutions
  • U.S. Forest Service
  • National Park Service
  • Environmental Protection Agency
  • NASA
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute of Health
  • Small Business Administration
  • No Child Left Behind
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act
  • American Indian Reservation funds for basic necessities and services
  • National Wildlife Refuge system
  • National Endowments for the Arts
  • National Endowment for the Humanities
  • Clean Water State Revolving Fund
  • The National Academies (Sciences, Medicine, Engineering, Research Council)
  • The USDA
  • Federally-Funded Public Libraries


2008-10-19-500pxU.S._Federal_Spending__FY_2007.jpg

This isn't change we can believe in; it's change we can fear.

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kim-mance/mccains-spending-freeze-w_b_135859.html

In case you needed more proof not to vote for McCain

He says so himself (and proudly) that he voted with Bush over 90% of the time. How has that worked for you and your family?





Cindy McCain Tax Returns: Reports $4.2 Million In 2007

She reported $4.2 million, paid $1.1 million in taxes and was taxed at 26%???? Why am I making waaaaaay less than that and paying 33%. . . .this, 'my friends', is Socialism.

WASHINGTON — Republican presidential candidate John McCain's wife, Cindy, reported $4.2 million in income for 2007, nearly $2 million less than she reported the previous year, according to tax returns released by the McCain campaign Friday. Mrs. McCain, who files her taxes separately from her husband, paid $1.1 million in taxes, a tax rate of about 26 percent. She reported nearly $530,000 in itemized deductions.

The McCain campaign said her losses were in investment income directly related to her family business, Hensley & Co., an Arizona beer distributorship of which she is chairwoman.

"The reduction is a combination of capital investments in the business and, like many companies, Hensley has felt the impact of a weakened economy," McCain spokesman Brian Jones said.

The Arizona senator's campaign had released her 2006 return in May but said Mrs. McCain had requested an extension on her 2007 return.

McCain himself released his own tax return last April, reporting a total income of $405,409 in 2007 and $84,460 in federal income taxes.

Democratic rival Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, made their returns public earlier this year, reporting $4.2 million in 2007 income, most of it profits from his books, "Dreams From My Father" and "The Audacity of Hope."

The McCain campaign only released the summary pages of Mrs. McCain's returns, thus offering limited information on her finances. She listed nearly $2.9 million in income from rental real estate, royalties, partnerships and trusts _ a category that would include her investment income from Hensley & Co. She had reported $4.5 million in that category in 2006.

She also reported $297,000 in salary income, more than $118,000 in dividends and more than $746,000 in capital gains. Her dividend income dropped by about $165,000 from 2006.

Perhaps anticipating higher income, she overpaid her taxes over the year by more than $950,000. She applied that amount to her 2008 estimated tax.

As an heiress to the Hensley fortune, Cindy McCain's worth has been estimated at more than $100 million.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/17/cindy-mccain-2007-income_n_135748.html

McCain campaigner mugging a HOAX

Ladies and gentlemen: THIS is the face of the Republican Party today; lies, racism, fear-mongering, and a willingness to say-anything, no matter how unethical, to win an election. It is pathetic. Absolutely disgusting.

The big political story of the day revolves around what turned out to be a non-story. Several media outlets (the vast majority conservative) were left with egg on their faces after they trumpeted up the tale of a McCain volunteer who claimed to have been assaulted by a large black man because of a McCain bumper sticker on her car. On her face was carved a backwards 'B' (meant to represent Obama's name). The Drudge Report called it "mutilation."



It was a hoax. And now, some in the fourth estate are left to explain why they pushed this apparent political ploy. Those in the business who showed some prudence are calling out their competitors for taking the bait.



On CNN today, anchor Rick Sanchez did just that, naming the outlets that not only reported but actively pushed the story of Ashley Todd. In addition to explaining why his station didn't report the story, Sanchez dug the knife in a bit deeper when it came to Hugh Hewitt, the conservative radio talk show host who appeared on CNN Thursday and blamed "that side" (i.e. the Democrats) for engaging in "extraordinarily" disturbing acts.





"Part of the story is the fact that it was reported by the media," said Sanchez. "We would not be telling the story now had it not been carried by so many outlets. As I mentioned before, it was mentioned on, as a matter of fact I have a list and not to mention names, but the initials of the news organizations are Fox News, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and Newsday. And also radio talk show hosts went on their radio stations and talked ad infinitum about the story yesterday, one of them even seemingly being a braggadocio about it when he was on the air with our own Wolf Blitzer yesterday."



Separately, the College Republicans -- a group of which Todd is a member -- sought to distance themselves from the whole affair, telling the Huffington Post: "When Ms. Todd initially contacted us claiming to have been attacked, our first reaction was obviously to be concerned for her safety ... We are as upset as anyone to learn of her deceit. Ashley must take full responsibility for her actions."

Currently listening :
Little Lies
By Fleetwood Mac

More irresponsible spending by the McCain camp

The New York Times is reporting that McCain Campaign makeup stylist cost $22,800 for the first two weeks of October. The stylist, Amy Strozzi, was apparently paid more than any other McCain staffer during that period. She beat out Randy Scheunemann (Defense and Foreign Policy Coordinator for the McCain campaign), who received $12,500 in the first half of October, and McCain spokesperson Nicole Wallace, who got $12,000. It's too bad though that whenever Sarah speaks Amy's work is completely undone.


Times article linked from the Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/24/palins-makeup-artist-is-m_n_137513.html

Currently listening :
Sugar Daddy
By Melissa Lefton

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Why veterans are NOT supporting McCain

Amazing that a guy who served his country and spent years as a war prisoner doesn't support the troops.

The McCain motto, "Love America, Hate Americans"???

God bless our troops, and from the bottom of my heart thank you for everything you do for the rest of us. We owe you so much more than you are given.

John McCain: Less jobs, more wars

Currently listening to :
One
By Metallica
Release date: 1993-05-27

McCain on free trade

Senator McCain, when will you realize that it is un-American to continually send all of our manufacturing jobs overseas? When there is nothing left to make here, and all of our call centers are in India, how exactly do you propose our American citizens are going to be able to make a living?

John McCain on Free Trade:
Voted YES on free trade agreement with Oman.
Voted YES on implementing CAFTA for Central America free-trade.
Voted YES on establishing free trade between US & Singapore.
Voted YES on establishing free trade between the US and Chile.
Voted YES on extending free trade to Andean nations.
Voted YES on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam.
Voted NO on removing common goods from national security export rules.
Voted YES on permanent normal trade relations with China.
Voted YES on expanding trade to the third world.
Voted YES on renewing 'fast track' presidential trade authority.
Voted NO on imposing trade sanctions on Japan for closed market.

John McCain is Pro-NAFTA, pro-GATT, pro-MFN, pro-Fast Track
John McCain promotes the Andean Free Trade Agreement.
John McCain is Rated 100% by CATO, indicating a pro-free trade voting record.
John McCain sponsored bill for trade with post-Orange Revolution Ukraine.

"Free trade is indispensable to our prosperity.
We are in a global marketplace, and that is exceptionally good news for American families. Withdrawing from it is not just inadvisable, it is impossible. Free trade is indispensable to our prosperity. In other words, the less America trades the
poorer America will be. Millions of American jobs are created by the export of American goods and services. Millions more jobs are created in companies that depend on goods and services that are imported here at lower cost than we can manufacture them." John McCain in Speech to National Press Club, 5/20/99


International Trade Buzzwords

  • 'Fast-Track' means authorizing the President to sign trade deals with a single yes-or-no Congressional vote after only limited debate.
    Supporting Fast-Track implies the speaker supports free trade.
  • 'Fair Trade' means placing restrictions on imports based on environmental, labor, or other concerns.
    Supporting Fair Trade implies the speaker is against free trade.
  • 'Trade Deficits' mean that the US imports more than we export to a particular country.
    Concern over trade deficits implies supporting trade restrictions against Mexico, Japan, and East Asia, with whom the US has large trade deficits.


    NAFTA

  • The North American Free Trade Agreement of 1994 establishes a free-trade zone between the US, Canada, and Mexico.
  • A 'free trade zone' means that goods can cross the border in either direction without tariffs or taxes of any kind.
  • Canada is the largest trading partner of the US, accounting for over 25% of both our imports and exports.
  • Mexico & Japan account for about 15% each; Europe combined for about 20%; and East Asia combined for about 15%.
  • NAFTA passed with some important compromises to protect the environment and labor standards; these are refered to as 'Side Agreements.'
  • In 1994, President Clinton invited Chile to join NAFTA as the next step toward a Free Trade Zone for the Americas.
  • In 2001, President Bush formalized the proposal of expanding NAFTA to a Free Trade Area for the Americas, encompassing 34 countries and 800 million people by 2005.

    GATT & WTO

  • The World Trade Organization is an international organization intended to reduce trade barriers, formed in 1995.
  • The General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs is the international treaty which preceded the WTO's formation; it began in 1947.
  • The 'Uruguay Round' was the most recently completed round of GATT negotiations, completed in 1994.
  • Negotiations to start a new 'Round' took place in Seattle in Dec. 1999, but were disrupted by riots.
  • WTO members (which includes the US and most industrialized countries) grant each other 'MFN' or Most Favored Nation status, which means minimal import tariffs.

    Globalization

  • 'Globalization' refers generally to free trade, open borders, improved communication and transportation, and the commerce implications of the Internet.
  • Specifically, anti-globalization advocates refer to the negative aspects of free trade on environmental and labor standards.
    At issue is that open borders cause corporations to seek out the lowest environmental and labor standards to minimize production costs, thereby pressuring for lower standards globally.
  • Anti-globalization advocates primarily focus on the secrecy of WTO proceedings, but also criticize other international trade organizations as too favorable to corporate interests.
  • Anti-globalization protests have been particularly effective since a large protest at a WTO meeting in Seattle in late 1999. The 2001 WTO meeting was held in Qatar (in the Persian Gulf) partially to make protest more difficult b its remoteness.
  • While the anti-corporate aspect of anti-globalization is primarily a liberal cause, many conservatives join the anti-globalization movement on grounds of protection of national sovereignty.
    At issue is that the WTO and international trade agreements override national law, and hence place the US Congress and the US President subordinate to an unelected foreign organization.
    'Anti-Dumping Laws'

  • Dumping: A country sells goods in the US at costs lower than they are sold in the home country, presumably with the intent of capturing market share.
  • Countervailing Duties: The US imposes import tariffs -- often 100% or more -- on goods which the government determines have been dumped.
  • In the last 4 years, the federal government found dumping in 107 cases, mostly steel from Asia but also on European bananas, and imposed countervailing duties.

    http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/John_McCain_Free_Trade.htm

    How do we fix the financial problem?
    Jobs, baby, Jobs!


  • Buy USA made!

    End the Regime.
    Nov 4th VOTE
    Obama Biden!

    Al-Qaeda Supporters Endorse McCain

    McCain couldn't land Colin Powell's endorsement, is an Al-Qaeda endorsement close enough???

    Al-Qaeda Supporters Endorse McCain
    PAMELA HESS | October 21, 2008 11:41 PM EST http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/22/al-qaeda-supporters-endor_n_136779.html

    WASHINGTON — Al-Qaida supporters suggested in a Web site message this week they would welcome a pre-election terror attack on the U.S. as a way to usher in a McCain presidency.

    The message, posted Monday on the password-protected al-Hesbah Web site, said if al-Qaida wants to exhaust the United States militarily and economically, "impetuous" Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain is the better choice because he is more likely to continue the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    "This requires presence of an impetuous American leader such as McCain, who pledged to continue the war till the last American soldier," the message said. "Then, al-Qaida will have to support McCain in the coming elections so that he continues the failing march of his predecessor, Bush."

    SITE Intelligence Group, based in Bethesda, Md., monitors the Web site and translated the message.

    "If al-Qaida carries out a big operation against American interests," the message said, "this act will be support of McCain because it will push the Americans deliberately to vote for McCain so that he takes revenge for them against al-Qaida. Al-Qaida then will succeed in exhausting America till its last year in it."

    Mark Salter, a senior McCain adviser, said he had heard about the Web site chatter but had no immediate comment.

    The message is credited to a frequent and apparently respected contributor named Muhammad Haafid. However, Haafid is not believed to have a direct affiliation with al-Qaida plans or knowledge of its operations, according to SITE.

    SITE senior analyst Adam Raisman said this message caught SITE's attention because there has been little other chatter on the forums about the U.S. election.

    SITE was struck by the message's detailed analysis _ and apparent jubilation _ about American financial woes.

    "What we try to do is get the pulse of the jihadist community," Raisman said. "And it's about the financial crisis."

    Al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden issued a videotape just four days before the 2004 U.S. presidential election directly addressing the American people.

    Monday, October 20, 2008

    New Questions Over McCain’s Health

    New Questions Over McCain's Health, Times Reports
    Nico Pitney October 19, 2008 07:16 PM http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/19/new-york-times-publishing_n_136002.html

    UPDATE: The New York Times piece is now online. Reporter Lawrence Altman, a medical doctor himself, finds that "serious gaps remain in the public's knowledge about the health of the presidential and vice-presidential nominees," which is "a striking departure from recent campaigns, in which many candidates and their doctors were more forthcoming."Of McCain, the Times reports:

    If elected, Senator John McCain of Arizona, 72, the Republican nominee, would be the oldest man to be sworn in to a first term as president and the first cancer survivor to win the office. The scars on his puffy left cheek are cosmetic reminders of the extensive surgery he underwent in 2000 to remove a malignant melanoma.
    Last May, his campaign and his doctors released nearly 1,200 pages of medical information, far more than the three other nominees. But the documents were released in a restricted way that leaves questions, even confusion, about his cancer.

    A critical question concerns inconsistencies in medical opinions about the severity of his melanoma; if the classification of his melanoma is more severe, it would increase the statistical likelihood of death from a recurrence of the cancer. [...]

    By not allowing reporters to interview him or his doctors extensively about his entire medical history, he has made it impossible to get a complete picture of his diagnoses and treatment.
    Both Barack Obama and Joe Biden released recent medical records to the Times showing that they were healthy, though Altman notes that Biden's documents "did not indicate whether he had had a test in recent years to detect any new aneurysm," and Obama's most recent check-up was in January 2007.

    Meanwhile, "Nothing is known publicly about Ms. Palin's medical history," Altman reports, "aside from the much-discussed circumstances surrounding the birth of her fifth child last April. Ms. Palin has said that her water broke while she was at a conference in Dallas and that she flew to Anchorage, where she gave birth to her son Trig hours after landing.

    "Last week Maria Comella, a spokeswoman for Ms. Palin, said the governor declined to be interviewed or provide any health records."

    The Doctor's World

    Many Holes in Disclosure of Nominees' Health
    By LAWRENCE K. ALTMAN, M.D.
    Published: October 19, 2008 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/20/us/politics/20health.html?_r=1&hp=&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin

    McCain Employing GOP Operative Accused Of Voter Registration Fraud

    You know the saying, when you point at someone three fingers are pointing back at you? Well, John McCain should be careful when he points. Why aren't we hearing about this on Fox, CNN, or ABC???

    McCain Employing GOP Operative Accused Of Voter Registration Fraud
    Sam Stein http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/20/mccain-employing-gop-oper_n_136254.html

    John McCain's campaign has directed $175,000 to the firm of a Republican operative accused of massive voter registration fraud in several states.

    According to campaign finance records, a joint committee of the McCain-Palin campaign, the RNC and the the California Republican Party, made a $175,000 payment to the group Lincoln Strategy in June for purposes of "registering voters." The managing partner of that firm is Nathan Sproul, a renowned GOP operative who has been investigated on multiple occasions for suppressing Democratic voter turnout, throwing away registration forms and even spearheading efforts to get Ralph Nader on ballots to hinder the Democratic ticket.

    In a letter to the Justice Department last October, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers said that that Sproul's alleged activities "clearly suppress votes and violate the law."

    That Sproul would come under the employment umbrella of the McCain campaign -- the Republican National Committee has also separately paid Lincoln Strategy at least $37,000 for voter registration efforts this cycle -- is not terribly surprising. Sproul, who has donated nearly $30,000 to McCain's campaign, has been in the good graces of GOP officials for the past decade despite charges of ethical and potentially legal wrongdoing.

    But his involvement with the Republican Party's voter registration efforts has the potential to create a political and public relations headache at a time when McCain can ill-afford one. For weeks the Arizona Republican and his allies have been seeking to tie Barack Obama to the community organization ACORN, which they have accused of potentially committing massive voter registration fraud. Sproul's contract with the GOP ticket -- in addition to news of Republican officials attempting to suppress Democratic turnout in California -- raises, for some, questions about McCain's own efforts.

    "It should certainly take away from McCain's argument," said Bob Grossfeld, a progressive political consultant based in Arizona who has followed Sproul's career. "Without knowing anything of what is going on with ACORN, there is a clear history with Mr. Sproul either going over the line or sure as hell kicking dirt on it, and doing it for profit and usually fairly substantive profit."

    As Republican Congressman Chris Cannon summarized during a joint hearing for the subcommittee on commercial and administrative law back in May 2008: "The difference between ACORN and Sproul is that ACORN doesn't throw away or change registration documents after they have been filled out."

    Indeed, Sproul's history is filled with allegations of political misdeeds. During the 2004 election, Sproul & Associates (the former name of Lincoln Strategy) was accused of attempting to destroy forms collected by Democratic voters in Nevada. That same year in Oregon, Sproul & Associates allegedly instructed canvassers to only accept Republican registration forms in addition to destroying those turned in by Democrats.

    In Minnesota, meanwhile, Sproul's firm was accused of actually firing workers who brought back Democratic registration forms, while other canvassers were allegedly paid "$13 an hour, with the $3 bonus for every Bush, undecided or Ralph Nader voter registration." Similar problems related to Sproul & Associates popped up in Pennsylvania and West Virginia.

    All of this was executed, it seems, through an elaborate web of deception. As Salon.com wrote back in 2004:

    Canvassers were told to act as if they were nonpartisan, to hide that they were working for the RNC, especially if approached by the media... In letters the firm sent to the libraries, Sproul misrepresented itself as America Votes -- a left-leaning national voter registration group not affiliated with Sproul -- but said that it was interested in registering "all those who wish to register to vote." Shortly after Sproul canvassers began working the libraries, though, patrons began complaining that the canvassers were being especially inquisitive about their political leanings, and some were pushing people to register as Republicans.

    Sproul has denied those charges, claiming often that his registration efforts were bipartisan and that any suggestion otherwise was nothing more than the testimony of disgruntled former employees. He did not return a request for comment for this article.

    But there has been a wide array of public complaint over the scope and nefariousness of his activities. Sens. Patrick Leahy and Ted Kennedy sent a letter to Attorney General John Ashcroft in 2004 asking that the Justice Department "launch an immediate investigation into the activities of Mr. Sproul and his firm." Three years later, members of Congress still weren't satisfied. Rep. Conyers complained in an Oct. 2007 letter that the Justice Department was not closely scrutinizing Sproul's efforts. "The alleged misconduct described by many witnesses," he wrote, "clearly suppress[es] votes and violate[s] the law."

    Indeed, those who have followed Sproul's rise in Republican circles argue that the pattern of behavior is too hard to dismiss as anything other than ethically-blurry, brass knuckle tactics.

    "The biggest single thing is that he is a true believer," said Grossfeld. "He might take this as a compliment, but he is as committed to the worldview and the neocon approach to life as any operative I have ever run across. He is absolutely devoted to whatever that ideology is and as a byproduct of that he will look for every opportunity he can, I believe to further his or his client's agenda."

    http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/McCain_Hired_GOP_Operative_Accused_of_Voter_Reg_Fraud_

    Sunday, October 19, 2008

    Who is really going to cut your taxes?

    McCain refers to Americans as "my fellow prisoners"



    Looks like we know how John McCain really views us, doesn't it? Would martial law be in our future under a McCain administration?