Saturday, December 20, 2008

How to Fight Toxic Exposure and Keep Chemicals Out of Your Home

Lifting the "Body Burden": How to Fight Toxic Exposure and Keep Chemicals Out of Your Home

Simran Sethi





From Seventh Generation's discussion on "Children and Chemicals," featuring Jane Houlihan of the Environmental Working Group, pediatrician Dr. Alan Greene, Courtney Loveman of Seventh Generation and moderated by Simran Sethi.

We can thank WWII for inventions like SPAM, plastic wrap, and modern-day chemical cleaning products. When hostilities ended, the same companies that had been manufacturing chemicals for nerve gas and other weapons began to bottle their concoctions for the general public, who used them to disinfect their homes. Sixty years later, Mr. Clean may seem well intentioned, but a toxic chemical is still a toxic chemical, no matter how diluted or how many "Danger! Do not swallow" warnings a bottle is branded with. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires that household chemicals label info on poison control and toxicity, but doesn't mandate ingredient disclosure. We each have our own allergies and sensitivities, so what may be deemed "safe" for one person may be harmful for another.

Kids are among the most vulnerable peeps. Children under the age of six are more likely to die from ingesting dish soap than any other product in the home. Luckily, most of us ingest or inhale dish soap residue in doses much too small to be lethal, but the chemicals are still having an effect. Women who work at home are 54% more likely to die from cancer, because of a higher exposure to household cleaning products. And the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined that indoor air quality may be twice as polluted as outdoor air.

Environmental Working Group (EWG) has found that everyday products like dish soap and laundry detergent are polluting our air and our bloodstreams with toxic chemicals linked to cancer, infertility, and stunted development. You're probably thinking sure, you're fill-in-the-blank age, you've been exposed to a lot in your short/long life. But here's the kicker: we're toxic from womb to tomb. A recent EWG study tested the umbilical chord blood of 10 unborn babies, and found a total of 287 toxic chemicals, an average of 200 per fetus. (You can find out more in the accompanying video.) The chems in babies included 28 waste by-products, 47 consumer products like Teflon and Scotch Guard, and 212 industrial chemicals and pesticides (such as PCBs and DDT) that were already banned more than 30 years ago. Our newborns are coming into the world with a heavy "body burden" of toxins that will impact their health and development.

Theoretically, our government should be protecting children from exposure to toxic chemicals that may lead to major health concerns. But our outdated Toxic Substances Control Act assumes all chemicals to be safe until proven otherwise, and doesn't require studies for new chemicals introduced to the market. When Bisphenol-A, a common component in plastic baby bottles and water bottles, was found to have strong links to cancer earlier this year, the Canadian government publicly declared the substance "dangerous," the first step in a countrywide ban. Due to consumer pressure, Nalgene has since phased out bisphenol-A bottles and Target pulled baby bottles containing the substance from their shelves. But the U.S. government has taken no action to officially ban bisphenol-A or warn Americans of the danger. The Food and Drug Administration actually said, "we believe there is a large body of evidence that indicates that FDA-regulated products containing BPA currently on the market are safe and that exposure levels to BPA from food contact materials, including for infants and children, are below those that may cause health effects." As far as we know, American citizenship doesn't automatically immunize us to the effects of toxic chemicals, so why is our government so much more careless than our neighbors up north?

Don't despair. The bad news is also good news--if these carcinogenic and damaging chemicals come from the products we buy, we also have the power to keep our homes and schools toxin-free. Buying sustainable furniture, eating organic foods and steering clear of high-mercury fish like tuna, filtering tap water, and improving home air quality with toxin-filtering plants are all easy steps we can take to cleanse our immediate environments. But we can't control everything (as much as we try). Everyone is at risk of exposure unless our government takes proactive measures to regulate chemicals and require companies to disclose full ingredient lists on their bottles.

Seventh Generation, the largest natural cleaning and home care product company in the world, has stepped up without a government stick. They're leading a "Show the World What's Inside" campaign for full ingredient disclosure on all household cleaners. (Watch their webcast on "Toxic Chemicals and Children," that Simran moderated, for more info.) Taking the power of knowledge a step further, Seventh Gen's website includes a database where consumers can search hard-to-pronounce chemicals to find out exactly what they're used for and how they affect the human body. In addition to accessing it from your desktop, the application can be downloaded onto your iPhone or BlackBerry so you can search ingredients at the store.

Seventh Generation and EWG have also teamed up in support of Senator Frank Lautenberg's (D-NJ) proposed Kid Safe Chemical Act. The bill would require basic data on all industrial chemicals and establish a national program to assess human exposure, assuming new chemicals to be toxic until proved otherwise instead of the other way around. We've signed a petition supporting the bill here.

Clean can be green, when you know what to do. Heather swears by the boiling water, vinegar and baking soda combo. Simran's lazier and uses Seventh Gen, Ecover and Mrs. Meyer's products. Sign the petition...and tell us your favorite household fix.

This post was written by Simran Sethi and Heather Mueller.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Taxes and how they relate to the economic status of America

Checkout this table and notice how the tax rates for the wealthy were cut just before the Great Depression.

Trickle down economics didn't work then and it certainly isn't working now. The only way to have a viable economy is if the people have enough money to spend on goods and services, and to save and invest. Keeping 90% of the wealth in 6% of the population does not free up spending money for the working class.

Tax Rates1

Bottom bracket

Top bracket

Calendar
Year

Rate
(percent)

Taxable income up to

Rate
(percent)

Taxable income over

1913-15

1

$20,000

7

$500,000

1916

2

20,000

15

2,000,000

1917

2

2,000

67

2,000,000

1918

6

4,000

77

1,000,000

1919-20

4

4,000

73

1,000,000

1921

4

4,000

73

1,000,000

1922

4

4,000

56

200,000

1923

3

4,000

56

200,000

1924

21.5

4,000

46

500,000

1925-28

21?

4,000

25

100,000

1929

24?

4,000

24

100,000

1930-31

21?

4,000

25

100,000

1932-33

4

4,000

63

1,000,000

1934-35

34

4,000

63

1,000,000

1936-39

34

4,000

79

5,000,000

1940

34.4

4,000

81.1

5,000,000

1941

310

2,000

81

5,000,000

1942-433

319

2,000

88

200,000

1944-45

23

2,000

594

200,000

1946-47

19

2,000

586.45

200,000

1948-49

16.6

4,000

582.13

400,000

1950

17.4

4,000

591

400,000

1951

20.4

4,000

591

400,000

1952-53

22.2

4,000

592

400,000

1954-63

20

4,000

591

400,000

1964

16

1,000

77

400,000

1965-67

14

1,000

70

200,000

1968

14

1,000

675.25

200,000

1969

14

1,000

677

200,000

1970

14

1,000

671.75

200,000

1971

14

1,000

770

200,000

1972-78

814

1,000

770

200,000

1979-80

814

2,100

770

212,000

1981

8 913.825

2,100

7 9 69.125

212,000

1982

812

2,100

50

106,000

1983

811

2,100

50

106,000

1984

811

2,100

50

159,000

1985

811

2,180

50

165,480

1986

811

2,270

50

171,580

1987

811

3,000

38.5

90,000

1988

815

29,750

1028

29,750

1989

815

30,950

1028

30,950

1990

815

32,450

1028

32,450

1991

815

34,000

31

82,150

1992

815

35,800

31

86,500

1993

815

36,900

39.6

250,000

1994

815

38,000

39.6

250,000

1995

815

39,000

39.6

256,500

1996

815

40,100

39.6

263,750

1997

815

41,200

39.6

271,050

1998

815

42,350

39.6

278,450

1999

815

43,050

39.6

283,150

2000

815

43,850

39.6

288,350

1 Taxable income excludes zero bracket amount from 1977 through 1986. Rates shown apply only to married persons filing joint returns beginning in 1948. Does not include either the add on minimum tax on preference items (1970-1982) or the alternative minimum tax (1979-present). Also, does not include the effects of the various tax benefit phase-outs (e.g. the personal exemption phase-out). From 1922 through 1986 and from 1991 forward, lower rates applied to long-term capital gains.

2 After earned-income deduction equal to 25 percent of earned income.

3 After earned-income deduction equal to 10 percent of earned income.

4 Exclusive of Victory Tax.

5 Subject to the following maximum effective rate limitations.
[year and maximum rate (in percent)] 1994-45 - 90; 1946-47 - 85.5; 1948-49 - 77.0; 1950 - 87.0; 1951 - 87.2; 1952-53 - 88.0; 1954-63 - 87.0.

6 Includes surcharge of 7.5 percent in 1968, 10 percent in 1969, and 2.6 percent in 1970.

7 Earned income was subject to maximum marginal rates of 60 percent in 1971 and 50 percent from 1972 through 1981.

8 Beginning in 1975, a refundable earned-income credit is allowed for low-income individuals.

9 After tax credit is 1.25 percent against regular tax.

10 The benefit of the first rate bracket is eliminated by an increased rate above certain thresholds. The phase-out range of the benefit of the first rate bracket was as follows: Taxable income between $71,900 and $149,250 in 1988; taxable income between $74,850 and $155,320 in 1989; and t axable income between $78,400 and $162,770 in 1990. The phase-out of the benefit the first rate bracket was repealed for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1990. This added 5 percentage points to the marginal rate for those affected by the phaseout, producing a 33 percent effective rate.

Source: Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation

source: http://www.hkmscpa.com/hist%20tax%20rates.htm

Thomas Jefferson on debt


Bush's Final F.U.

Bush's Final F.U.

source: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/24991066/bushs_final_fu

The administration is rushing to enact a host of last-minute regulations that will screw America for years to come

TIM DICKINSON

Posted Dec 25, 2008 11:55 AM

With president-elect Barack Obama already taking command of the financial crisis, it's tempting to think that regime change in America is a done deal. But if George Bush has his way, the country will be ruled by his slash-and-burn ideology for a long time to come.

In its final days, the administration is rushing to implement a sweeping array of "midnight regulations" — de facto laws issued by the executive branch — designed to lock in Bush's legacy. Under the last- minute rules, which can be extremely difficult to overturn, loaded firearms would be allowed in national parks, uranium mining would be permitted near the Grand Canyon and many injured consumers would no longer be able to sue negligent manufacturers in state courts. Other rules would gut the Endangered Species Act, open millions of acres of wild lands to mining, restrict access to birth control and put local cops to work spying for the federal government.

"It's what we've seen for Bush's whole tenure, only accelerated," says Gary Bass, executive director of the nonpartisan group OMB Watch. "They're using regulation to cement their deregulatory mind-set, which puts corporate interests above public interests."

While every modern president has implemented last-minute regulations, Bush is rolling them out at a record pace — nearly twice as many as Clinton, and five times more than Reagan. "The administration is handing out final favors to its friends," says Véronique de Rugy, a scholar at George Mason University who has tracked six decades of midnight regulations. "They couldn't do it earlier — there would have been too many political repercussions. But with the Republicans having lost seats in Congress and the presidency changing parties, Bush has nothing left to lose."

The most jaw-dropping of Bush's rule changes is his effort to eviscerate the Endangered Species Act. Under a rule submitted in November, federal agencies would no longer be required to have government scientists assess the impact on imperiled species before giving the go-ahead to logging, mining, drilling, highway building or other development. The rule would also prohibit federal agencies from taking climate change into account in weighing the impact of projects that increase greenhouse emissions — effectively dooming polar bears to death-by-global-warming. According to Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, "They've taken the single biggest threat to wildlife and said, 'We're going to pretend it doesn't exist, for regulatory purposes.'"

Bush is also implementing other environmental rules that will cater to the interests of many of his biggest benefactors:

BIG COAL In early December, the administration finalized a rule that allows the industry to dump waste from mountaintop mining into neighboring streams and valleys, a practice opposed by the governors of both Tennessee and Kentucky. "This makes it legal to use the most harmful coal-mining technology available," says Allen Hershkowitz, a senior scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council. A separate rule also relaxes air-pollution standards near national parks, allowing Big Coal to build plants next to some of America's most spectacular vistas — even though nine of 10 EPA regional administrators dissented from the rule or criticized it in writing. "They're willing to sacrifice the laws that protect our national parks in order to build as many new coal plants as possible," says Mark Wenzler, director of clean-air programs for the National Parks Conservation Association. "This is the last gasp of Bush and Cheney's disastrous policy, and they've proven there's no line they won't cross."

BIG OIL In a rule that becomes effective just three days before Obama takes office, the administration has opened up nearly 2 million acres of mountainous lands in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming for the mining of oil shale — an energy-intensive process that also drains precious water resources. "The administration has admitted that it has no idea how much of Colorado's water supply would be required to develop oil shale, no idea where the power would come from and no idea whether the technology is even viable," says Sen. Ken Salazar of Colorado. What's more, Bush is slashing the royalties that Big Oil pays for oil-shale mining from 12.5 percent to five percent. "A pittance," says Salazar.

BIG AGRICULTURE Factory farms are getting two major Christmas presents from Bush this year. Circumventing the Clean Water Act, the administration has approved last-minute regulations that will allow animal waste from factory farms to seep, unmonitored, into America's waterways. The regulation leaves it up to the farms themselves to decide whether their pollution is dangerous enough to require them to apply for a permit. "It's the fox guarding the henhouse — all too literally," says Pope. The water rule goes into effect December 22nd, and a related rule in the works would exempt factory farms from reporting air pollution from animal waste.

BIG CHEMICAL In October, two weeks after consulting with industry lobbyists, the White House exempted more than 100 major polluters from monitoring their emissions of lead, a deadly neurotoxin. Seemingly hellbent on a more toxic future, the administration will also allow industry to treat 3 billion pounds of hazardous waste as "recycling" each year, and to burn another 200 million pounds of hazardous waste reclassified as "fuel," increasing cancer-causing air pollution. The rule change is a reward to unrepentant polluters: Nearly 90 percent of the factories that will be permitted to burn toxic waste have already been cited for violating existing environmental protections.

Environmental rollbacks may take center stage in Bush's final deregulatory push, but the administration is also promulgating a bevy of rules that will strip workers of labor protections, violate civil liberties, and block access to health care for women and the poor. Among the worst abuses:

LABOR Under Bush, the Labor Department issued only one major workplace-safety rule in eight years — and that was under a court order. But now the Labor Department is finalizing a rule openly opposed by Obama that would hamper the government's ability to protect workers from exposure to toxic chemicals. Bypassing federal agencies, Labor Secretary Elaine Chao developed the rule in secret, relying on a report that has been withheld from the public. Under the last-minute changes, federal agencies would be expected to gather unnecessary data on workplace exposure and jump through more bureaucratic hurdles, adding years to an already cumbersome regulatory process.

In another last-minute shift, the administration has rewritten rules to make it harder for workers to take time off for serious medical conditions under the Family and Medical Leave Act. In addition, the administration has upped the number of hours that long-haul truckers can be on the road. The new rule — nearly identical to one struck down by a federal appeals court last year — allows trucking companies to put their drivers behind the wheel for 11 hours a day, with only 34 hours of downtime between hauls. The move is virtually certain to kill more motorists: Large-truck crashes already kill 4,800 drivers and injure another 76,000 every year.

HEALTH CARE In late August, the administration proposed a new regulation ostensibly aimed at preventing pharmacy and clinic workers from being forced to participate in abortions. But the wording of the new rule is so vague as to allow providers to deny any treatment that anyone in their practice finds objectionable — including contraception, family planning and artificial insemination. Thirteen state attorneys general protested the regulation, saying it "completely obliterates the rights of patients to legal and medically necessary health care services."

In a rule that went into effect on December 8th, the administration also limited vision and dental care for more than 50 million low-income Americans who rely on Medicaid. "This means the states are going to have to pick up the tab or cut the services at a time when a majority of states are in a deficit situation," says Bass of OMB Watch. "It's a horrible time to do this." To make matters worse, the administration has also raised co-payments for Medicaid, forcing families on poverty wages to pay up to 10 percent of the cost for doctor visits and medicine. One study suggests that co-payments could cause Medicaid patients to skip nearly a fifth of all prescription-drug treatments. "People who have nothing are being asked to pay for services they rely upon to live," says Elaine Ryan, vice president of government relations for AARP. "Imposing co-pays on the poorest and sickest people in the United States is cynical and cruel."

NATIONAL SECURITY Under midnight regulations, the administration is seeking to lock in the domestic spying it began even before 9/11. One rule under consideration would roll back Watergate-era prohibitions barring state and local law enforcement from spying on Americans and sharing that information with U.S. intelligence agencies. "If the federal government announced tomorrow that it was creating a new domestic intelligence agency of more than 800,000 operatives reporting on even the most mundane everyday activities, Americans would be outraged," says Michael German, a former FBI agent who now serves as national security policy counsel for the ACLU. "This proposed rule change is the final step in creating an America we no longer recognize — an America where everyone is a suspect."

John Podesta, the transition chief for the Obama administration, has vowed that the new president will leverage his "executive authority" to fight Bush's last-minute rule changes. But according to experts who study midnight regulations, there's surprisingly little an incoming executive can do to overturn such rules. The Bush administration succeeded in repealing just three percent of the regulations finalized before Bill Clinton left office in 2001. "Midnight regulations under Bush are being executed early and with great intent," says Bass of OMB Watch. "And that intent is to lock the next administration into these regulations, making it very difficult for Obama to undo what Bush just did."

To protect the new rules against repeal, the Bush administration began amping up its last-gasp regulatory process back in May. The goal was to have all new regulations finalized by November 1st, providing enough time to accommodate the 60-day cooling-off period required before major rule changes — those that create an economic impact greater than $100 million — can be implemented.

Now, however, the administration has fallen behind schedule — so it's gaming the system to push through its rules. In several cases, the Office of Management and Budget has fudged the numbers to classify rules that could have billion-dollar consequences as "non-major" — allowing any changes made through mid-December to take effect in just 30 days, before Obama is inaugurated. The administration's determination of what constitutes a major change is not subject to review in court, and the White House knows it: Spokesman Tony Fratto crowed that the 60-day deadline is "irrelevant to our process."

Once a rule is published in the Federal Register, the Obama administration will have limited options for expunging it. It can begin the rule-making process anew, crafting Obama rules to replace the Bush rules, but that approach could take years, requiring time-consuming hearings, scientific fact-finding and inevitable legal wrangling. Or, if the new rules contain legal flaws, a judge might allow the Obama administration to revise them more quickly. Bush's push to gut the Endangered Species Act, for example, was done in laughable haste, with 15 employees given fewer than 36 hours to review and process more than 200,000 public comments. "The ESA rule is enormously vulnerable to a legal challenge on the basis that there was inadequate public notice and comment," says Pope of the Sierra Club. "The people who did that reviewing will be put on a witness stand, and it will become clear to a judge that this was a complete farce." But even that legal process will take time, during which industry will continue to operate under the Bush rules.

The best option for overturning the rules, ironically, may be a gift bestowed on Obama by Newt Gingrich. Known as the Congressional Review Act, it was passed in 1996 to give Congress the option of overriding what GOP leaders viewed at the time as excessive regulation by Bill Clinton. The CRA allows Congress to not only kill a new rule within 60 days, but to do so with a simple, filibuster-immune majority. De Rugy, the George Mason scholar, expects Democrats in the House and Senate to make "very active use of the Congressional Review Act."

But even this option, it turns out, is fraught with obstacles. First, the CRA requires a separate vote on each individual regulation. Second, the act prohibits reviving any part of a rule that has been squelched. Since Bush's rules sometimes contain useful reforms — the move to limit the Family and Medical Leave Act also extends benefits for military families — spiking the rules under the CRA would leave Obama unable to restore or augment those benefits in the future. Whatever Obama does will require him to expend considerable political capital, at a time when America faces two wars and an economic crisis of historic proportions.

"It's going to be very challenging for Obama," says Bass. "Is he going to want to look forward and begin changing the way government works? Or is he going to look back and fix the problems left by Bush? Either way, it's a tough call."

[From Issue 1068-69 — December 25, 2008 - January 8, 2009]

Related Stories:

Bush's Midnight Regulations


HEALTH CARE
- Cutting medicaid
- Allowing healthcare workers to refuse “morally objectionable” procedures
- Revising rules for international drug trials
- Narrowing the definition of combat related disability
- Allowing states to set premiums and higher co-payments

ENVIRONMENT
- Allowing mining near the Grand Canyon
- Discounting global warming when assessing species risks
- Weakening the Endangered Species Act
- Eliminating review of fishing regulations
- Allowing more emissions from power plants
- Opening protected land to energy development
- Allowing factory farms to self-regulate waste
- Altering solid waste definition
- Allowing snowmobiles in Yellowstone
- Allowing coal companies to dump dirt and rock into streams

CIVIL LIBERTIES
- Allowing guns in national parks
- Allowing broader law-enforcement monitoring
- Implementing the REAL ID Act

LABOR
- Allowing truckers to work 14 hour days
- Requiring labor unions to file extensive financial reports
- Making it harder to regulate toxic substances on the job
- Stripping collective bargaining rights from federal employees
- Relaxing rules on investment adviser conflicts of interest
- Revising H-2A visa rules to lower wages and encourage exploitation

TAXES
- Significantly reducing corporate taxes

ADMINISTRATION
- Moving political appointees to permanent posts

Click here to download a pdf of the report.

Health Care

- Cutting back Medicaid: New rules “narrowed the scope of services that can be provided to poor people under Medicaid’s outpatient hospital benefit.”

- Allowing healthcare workers to refuse procedures for moral or religious reasons: The rule would allow doctors, nurses and pharmacists “to refuse to participate in any procedure they find morally objectionable, including abortion and possibly even artificial insemination and birth control.” The rule also makes it clear “that healthcare workers also may refuse to provide information or advice to patients who might want an abortion.”

- Revising the rules for international drug trials: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently to no longer hold pharmaceutical companies to the standards of the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki while conducting human drug trials. The new rule requires “that pharmaceutical companies comply only with local regulations where the trials are conducted.”

- Narrowing the definition of combat related disability: A change made by the Pentagon in March narrowed the definition of combat related disability, “costing some injured veterans thousands of dollars in lost benefits.” The veterans advocacy group Disabled American Veterans called the policy revision a “shocking level of disrespect for those who stood in harm’s way.”

- Allowing states to set premiums and higher co-payments: A new rule “gives states sweeping authority to charge premiums and higher co-payments for doctors’ services, hospital care and prescription drugs provided to low-income people under Medicaid.” The New York Times described the rule as a “sea change” in Medicaid.

Labor

- Making it harder to take paid time off: Changes to the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) “make it more difficult for employees to use paid vacation or personal days when they take leave for medical or family emergencies,” and state that “a worker with a chronic health condition is required to certify doctor visits at least twice a year for that condition.”

- Allowing truck drivers to work 14 hour days: Changes to Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration rules “allow truckers to drive as many as 11 consecutive hours” and work up to 14 hour days.

- Requiring labor unions to file extensive financial reports: The Office of Labor-Management Standards is moving to finalize a rule that would require labor unions to file extensive annual financial reports for trusts, such as pension funds, they have established to benefit their members (T-1 Form). This proposal is seen as an effort to overload labor unions with paperwork.

- Making it harder to regulate toxic substances on the job: The Labor Department is trying to complete a new rule, supported by business groups, that would “make it much harder for the government to regulate toxic substances and hazardous chemicals to which workers are exposed on the job.”

- Stripping collective bargaining rights from federal employees: Bush issued an executive order “that denies collective bargaining rights to about 8,600 federal employees who work in law enforcement, intelligence and other agencies responsible for national security.” 900 of these employees were already represented by collective bargaining units.

- Relaxing rules on investment advisers conflicts of interest: The new regulation “would relax the rules on when investment advisers can recommend products sold by their own companies.” Consumer groups say the change “could put retirement savings at risk.”

- Revising H-2A visa rules to lower wages and encourage exploitation: The Department of Labor issued changes to the H-2A visa that “revise the way wages are calculated and will lower them substantially.” The changes also “reduce requirements for growers to prove they have made a good-faith effort to recruit U.S. workers.” The changes could lead to the easy exploitation of immigrant workers.

Environment

- Allowing mining near the Grand Canyon: A rule issued by the Bureau of Land Management prevents Congress from ordering emergency withdrawal of federal land from mining claims. The House Natural Resources Committee “issued such a withdrawal order in June for about 1 million acres near the Grand Canyon.”

- Allowing federal agencies to discount global warming when assessing risks to endangered species: The goal of the change is to “is to eliminate a long-standing provision of the Endangered Species Act that requires an independent scientific review by either the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of any federal project that could affect a protected species.” Instead, individual agencies would decide whether a project could harm an imperiled species.

- Weakening the Endangered Species Act: The rules would eliminate the input of federal wildlife scientists in some endangered species cases, [by allowing] the federal agency in charge of building, authorizing or funding a project to determine for itself whether a project would be likely to harm endangered wildlife and plants.

Eliminating environmental reviews of fishing regulations: A rule change proposed by National Marine Fisheries Service would repeal a requirement that “environmental impact statements be prepared for certain fisheries-management decisions.” Instead, the government would “give review authority to regional councils dominated by commercial and recreational fishing interests.”

Allowing more emissions from power plants: The Environmental Protection Agency is “finalizing new air-quality rules that would make it easier to build coal-fired power plants, oil refineries and other major polluters near national parks and wilderness areas” by weakening the Clean Air Act.

Opening protected wilderness areas to energy development: Despite being blocked by “federal court and administrative rulings,” the Bureau of Land Management is “reviving plans to sell oil and gas leases in pristine wilderness areas in eastern Utah that have long been protected from development.”

- Letting factory farms voluntarily decide if they need permits to discharge waste into waterways: The new rule “asks companies that run confined animal feeding operations to voluntarily apply for permits to discharge waste into waterways. If the operators don’t think they pollute enough, they are under no obligation to get permits.”

- Altering the definition of solid waste: This rule “effectively exempts about 1.5 million tons of hazardous waste that is recycled from a regulation that required such material to meet strict labeling, transportation and disposal rules.”

- Allowing snowmobiles in Yellowstone: Overturning a ban on snowmobiles put in place during the Clinton administration, the National Park Service “proposed that 318 snowmobiles would be allowed in Yellowstone per day while 50 would be given access to Grand Teton. That’s down from a combined 605 snowmobiles in a plan that was rejected by a federal judge in September.”

- Allowing coal companies to dump dirt and rock into streams: A proposed rule by the Office of Surface Mining “would allow coal companies to dump rock and dirt from mountaintop mining operations into nearby streams and valleys.”

Civil Liberties

- Allowing guns in national parks: The Department of the Interior finalized a rewrite to “the policy for the national parks, with the idea that federal regulations should “mirror” state laws on guns in parks.” The decision allows “concealed, loaded firearms at 388 of 391 national park sites.”

- Broadening law enforcements monitoring abilities: The new rule “would broaden the scope of activities authorities could monitor to include organizations as well as individuals, along with non-criminal activities that are deemed ‘suspicious.’

- Issuing final rules to implement the REAL ID Act:The Department of Homeland Security issued a final rule to implement the REAL ID Act that sets minimum standards for state-issued driver’s licenses and identification cards. This rule has “rendered REAL ID virtually useless as a security measure, while still posing serious privacy problems.” The rule places no limit on the permissible uses of the REAL ID card by governmental or commercial entities, leading to concern that the REAL ID card will become a de facto national ID card.

Taxes

- Significantly reducing corporate taxes: The Internal Revenue Service has been “unusually aggressive in doing what it can to lower corporate taxes, going above and beyond what has been allowed in the past.” The changes “drain billions of dollars of badly needed tax revenue at a time when the federal deficit is mushrooming.”

Administration

- Protecting political appointees by shifting them to permanent posts: The administration’s shifting of political appointees to civil service posts in the Interior, Labor, and Housing and Urban Development departments, “at least initially will deprive the incoming Obama administration of the chance to install its preferred appointees in some key jobs.”

source: http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/bush-sprint-finish/

Midnight Regulations


Monday, December 15, 2008

An eye opener on our economic situation

I.O.U.S.A.




We haven't seen the worst of it yet. . . Be sure to send a message to congress demanding they do something to stop the fiscal crisis http://www.iousathemovie.com/takeaction/